| USEFUL
TECHNICAL DATA |
|
American Forest & Paper Assoc. American Iron & Steel Institute National Asphalt Paving Association National
Association for
Regional Biomass Energy Program U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Solid Waste
National Recycling Coalition (NRC) Solid
Waste Association of Waste Equipment Technology Association (WASTEC)
Environmental Sites on the Internet
|
Items Found on This Page:
|
||
|
COMMINGLED CONTAINERS |
|||
|
Commingled Cans, Glass and Plastic Containers |
140 - 300 lb/cu. yd 5.2 - 11.1 lb/cu. ft. |
||
|
GLASS |
|||
|
Densities Whole Bottles Clear Green and Amber Crushed Glass Semi-Crushed 1.5" Mechanically Crushed 3/8" Furnace Ready Unit Weights Average 16-oz Bottle (Unbroken) Ave. Municipal Bottle (Unbroken) |
0 to 10% Broken 500 lb/cu. yd 550 lb/cu. yd 1000 lb/cu. yd 1800 lb/cu. yd 2700 lb/cu. yd 0.41 lb/bottle 0.55 lb/bottle |
||
|
ALUMINUM |
|||
|
Densities Whole (Unflattened) Flattened Unit Weight Weight of One Can |
45 lb/cu. yd 200 lb/cu. yd 0.032 lb/can 31.5 cans/lb |
||
|
PLASTICS |
|||
|
Densities PET, Whole HDPE (Natural), Whole HDPE (Colored), Whole Mix of Plastic Containers, Whole Unit Weights, Bottles PET, Two Liter HDPE (Natural), One Gallon HDPE (Colored), Half Gallon HDPE (Colored), One Gallon Plastic Bag, Grocery Bag |
34 lb/cu. yd; 220 bottles/cu. yd 30 lb/cu. yd; 180 bottles/cu. yd 45 lb/cu. yd; 171 bottles/cu. yd 38 lb/cu. yd; 110 bottles/cu. yd 0.15 lb/bottle; 6.5 bottles/lb 0.17 lb/bottle; 6.0 bottles/lb 0.27 lb/bottle; 3.8 bottles/lb 0.35 lb/bottle; 2.9 bottles/lb 0.0465 lb/plastic bag |
||
|
TIN-PLATED STEEL CANS |
|||
|
Densities Whole, Unflattened Unit Weights, Average Weight of Various Can Sizes (10 oz, 12 oz, 16 oz and 32 oz) |
150 lb/cu. yd 0.20 - 0.23 lb/can 5.0 - 4.3 cans/lb |
||
|
PAPER |
|||
|
Densities -- Loose and
Unbaled Newspaper Corrugated Mixed Office Waste Paper Magazines Drink Boxes and Milk Cartons Unit Weights, Brown Bag |
350 lbs/cu. yd 150 lbs/cu. yd 160 lbs/cu. yd 250 lbs/cu. yd 40 lb/cu. yd 0.177 lb/bag |
||
|
Orientation Principle Study the system relationships thoroughly prior to preliminary planning in order to identify existing methods and problems, and physical and economic constraints, and to establish future requirements and goals. |
Flexibility Principle Use methods and equipment which can perform a variety of tasks under a variety of operating conditions. |
||
|
Planning Principle Establish a plan to include basic requirements, desirable options, and the consideration of contingencies for all material handling and storage activities. |
Simplification Principle Simplify handling by eliminating, reducing, or combining unnecessary movements and/or equipment. |
||
|
Systems Principle Integrate those handling and storage which are economically viable into a coordinated system of operation including receiving, storage, production, assembly, packaging, warehousing, shipping, and transportation. |
Gravity Principle Utilize gravity to move material wherever possible, while respecting limitations concerning safety, product damage, and loss. |
||
|
Unit Load Principle Handling product in as large a unit load as practical. |
Safety Principle Provide safe material handling equipment and methods which follow existing safety codes and regulations in addition to accrued experience. |
||
|
Space Utilization Principle Make effective utilization of all cubic space. |
Computerization Principle Consider computerization in material handling and storage systems when circumstances warrant for improved material and information control. |
||
|
Standardization Principle Standardize handling methods and equipment wherever possible. |
Layout Principle Prepare an operational sequence and equipment layout for all viable systems solutions, then select the alternative system which best integrates efficiency and effectiveness. |
||
|
Ergonomic Principle Recognize human capabilities and limitations by designing material handling equipment and procedures for effective interaction with the people using the system. |
Cost Principle Compare the economic justification of alternative solutions in equipment and methods on the basis of economic effectiveness as measured by expense per unit handled. |
||
|
Energy Principle Include energy consumption of the material handling systems and material handling procedures when making comparisons or preparing economic justifications. |
Maintenance Principle Prepare a plan for preventive maintenance and scheduled repairs on all material handling equipment. |
||
|
Environmental Principle Minimize adverse effects on the environment when selecting material handling equipment and procedures. |
Reliability Principle Provide reliable and dependable material handling equipment from manufacturers who have demonstrated quality and longevity in the industry. |
||
|
Mechanization Principle Mechanize the handling process where feasible to increase efficiency and economy in the handling of materials. |
Accessibility Principle Readily have access to the knowledge, expertise, professionalism, and industry leadership provided by the RRT Design & Construction team. |
||
|
|
|||
Send Us E-mail: info@rrtenviro.com
© 1999-2003 RRT Design &
Construction
125 Baylis Road, Melville, NY 11747-3895
Tel (631) 756-1060 Fax (631) 756-1064